Showing posts with label Church issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church issues. Show all posts

Friday, February 02, 2007

Upgrading the Church's Soft Skills



"The inclusive, networking skills that are at such a premium in companies like Google are D team skills in the old business world. Known there as “soft skills” (i.e., less effective), these organic, relational ways of working are seen as feminine and therefore, weak, indecisive, people-pleasing, time-consuming, and manipulative. Yes, even as mega-companies like eBay (run by a woman), Starbucks, Apple, and Google have redefined “soft” skills as essential."
Quote by Sally Morgenthaler from Climbing the Corporate Web. The whole article is worth reading!


One reader tied in the author's point to the Church, saying:

"I can't help but think that some of the skills of the "hard-soft" leadership styles you described are precisely what is needed for the organism (and organization) that is the church today..."

Good point!


The author responds:
"Yes, the Google Church. Hard to imagine. But I do think that we are on the verge of a new era in ministry. Either we honor the relational, dare I say - collaborative - nature of the one we worship (Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier) and use this window of opportunity to release God's work into many hands, OR we fossilize in our command-and-control fixation."


Sunday, January 28, 2007

Sin and the Emerging Church

I found a great post on Emergesque regarding sin and the emerging church. The author begins by saying:

I've complained a bit in the past because I fear that in our reaction to something or another we in the emerging church don't think about or talk about or - most significantly - do as much as we should about sin (including our own - I include myself in this charge). And it bothers me that even writing that sentence makes me feel counter cultural to the emerging church ethos.


Read the rest of this very insightful post here.

I very much agree with this post, and responded by writing:


I really appreciate your insight in this article. You stated, "We in the emerging church don't think about or talk about or... do as much as we should about our own sin."I would take this one step further, and say that often we don't even define our negative choices as sin. In many cases, I think the idea of 'sin' might be removed from our theology.I think there are two reasons for this.
First, it is not always easy to determine what is sin, and what is not. The Bible cannot always guide us in this area, as many of the arguments about what is considered to be sin stem from our challenges in determining which Biblical directives are cultural, and which are timeless. For example, women in leadership and tithing.

Second, we have begun to take a more holistic, or ‘whole-person’ approach to sin. For example, homosexuality has traditionally been considered a sin. I’ve also heard it described as an ‘addiction’ by some. But when you get to know someone who is gay, and hear his or her story, it is suddenly very hard to describe that person as a ‘sinner’. If he or she has felt that way their whole life (even before they were sexually active), it can’t truly be called an addiction. And can it really be called a sin, as it seems to be part of their very nature? These are questions that are too complex for me to answer. Suddenly that person is not a sinner, but a friend who faces difficult challenges, just as I do. I believe God sees them that way as well. I think God sees the whole person, just as we are finally beginning to do.

So our very definitions of sin, and interpretations of the Bible, are in flux.

However, there are many things that can more easily be defined as sinful, such as lying, cheating, being spiritually lukewarm, etc. I think you’re right - In being such an accepting movement, we have begun to accept, and even take for granted, our own sins. And we avoid talking about them, perhaps so that everyone will feel accepted. But as you so aptly quoted, “…everyone who sins is a slave to sin” (John 8:34). We need to address the issues of sin, so that we can help each other toward freedom. By ignoring them, our brothers and sisters will likely end up feeling that they are alone in their battles. And they will erroneously think their leaders don’t struggle with the same problems!Your excerpt from Richard Baxter’s The Reformed Pastor is a powerful reminder of the importance of continually striving to live a pure life. In the emerging church movement, hypocrisy is often considered to be an ‘unforgivable’ sin. So, in a way, Baxter prophesied to us when he wrote, “Take heed to yourselves, lest your example contradict your doctrine…”

Denominational 'Branding'



Pernell Goodyear askes an interesting question in his self-titled blog:

What are people's impressions and experiences with church/denomination identification/branding?

What has your experience been? Is it healthy and normal to need to broadcast this belonging in branding form, and should I just get over the way I feel, or what? These are not rhetorical questions. Please comment.

See full post here.

This is a question I have thought about for some time, so thought my response is worth re-posting here:

I am anti-branding. I've read several comments where your readers explain how knowing you are SA might affect them for or against. The bottom line is, the logo causes people to form pre-conceived ideas which may be completely different than what your group is about.

My emergent group went through something similar when we first became official. We wanted to call ourselves "Emerge Community", as we consider ourselves a community of believers and searchers rather than a church. It took a certain amount of explanation and convincing before we were allowed to drop "Church" from our title, but we were required to include our denimination name "Foursquare". In my mind, you may as well shout WE ARE A CHURCH to the skies. Having the denomination name brands us as a church as much as if we'd included 'church' in our title. And I believe it did affect who chose to visit us.I don't advocate abanding all ties with your denomination.

I just think that visitors need a chance to see who YOU are first, without preconceived ideas.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence